User Tools

Site Tools


gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults

====== Differences ====== This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults [2015/03/23 11:48]
gibson [Exam 2]
gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults [2015/04/20 13:47] (current)
gibson [Exam 3]
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 As expected grades on exam #2 were significantly lower than on exam #1 and more in line with my usual expectation for a mean around 75% and standard deviation around 15%. As expected grades on exam #2 were significantly lower than on exam #1 and more in line with my usual expectation for a mean around 75% and standard deviation around 15%.
 +
 +===== Exam 3 =====
 +
 +{{:​gibson:​teaching:​spring-2015:​math527:​exam3hist.png?​direct&​500|}}
 +
 +We used a pretty generous grading rubric for this exam. As a result, even though it was harder, the scores are pretty much in line with my expectations of a median of 75% and a deviation of 15%. However, there were quite a few more very low scores (less than 50%) than typical. To adjust for this, we lowered the bottom ends for C and D by quite a bit. We also reviewed a number of exams with scores ranging from 40% to 80% and confirmed that the resultant letter grade appropriately reflected the quality of the work. 
gibson/teaching/spring-215/math527/examresults.1427136537.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2015/03/23 11:48 by gibson