User Tools

Site Tools


gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults

====== Differences ====== This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults [2015/03/16 09:38]
gibson [Exam 1]
gibson:teaching:spring-215:math527:examresults [2015/04/20 13:47] (current)
gibson [Exam 3]
Line 11: Line 11:
 {{:​gibson:​teaching:​spring-215:​math527:​exam2hist.png?​direct&​500|}} {{:​gibson:​teaching:​spring-215:​math527:​exam2hist.png?​direct&​500|}}
  
-As expected grades on exam #2 were significantly lower than on exam #1. +As expected grades on exam #2 were significantly lower than on exam #1 and more in line with my usual expectation for a mean around 75% and standard deviation around 15%. 
 + 
 +===== Exam 3 ===== 
 + 
 +{{:​gibson:​teaching:​spring-2015:​math527:​exam3hist.png?​direct&​500|}} 
 + 
 +We used a pretty generous grading rubric for this exam. As a result, even though it was harder, the scores are pretty much in line with my expectations of a median of 75% and a deviation of 15%. However, there were quite a few more very low scores (less than 50%) than typical. To adjust for this, we lowered the bottom ends for C and D by quite a bit. We also reviewed a number of exams with scores ranging from 40% to 80% and confirmed that the resultant letter grade appropriately reflected the quality of the work
gibson/teaching/spring-215/math527/examresults.1426523907.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/03/16 09:38 by gibson